Understanding how selection acts on individual genotypes often requires genotyping at different life stages and tracking their survival under experimental conditions. However, in mollusks, such as the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), collecting sufficient high-quality DNA without causing mortality remains challenging. While prior studies have explored different noninvasive genotyping methods, an optimal method hasn’t been identified. Here, we tested different techniques by combining two m...
Views
Downloads
These numbers come from web analytics and reflect real user activity on the site. Download counts include both page-based interactions and direct file downloads. They reliably show dataset usage and are mostly free of bot traffic.
Juvenile oysters ranging from 30mm to 60mm were sourced from the Aquaculture Genetics and Breeding Technology Center (ABC) at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS). Each oyster was cleaned using a 1% bleach solution, air-dried for an hour, and labeled with a shellfish tag (Hallprint FPN 8x4 mm) using coral epoxy (Instant Ocean HoldFast® Epoxy Stick).
To store the oysters before the experiment, the oysters were stored at 5°C for up to 48 hours before experimentation.
Treatment groups: We planned nine treatments to determine which protocol would have the best DNA yield with the lowest mortality (Figure 1 of Leung et al. 2026 (in press)). Each treatment had at least 20 individual oysters. The treatments and short names are described in Table 1 of Leung et al. 2026 (in press).
To establish a baseline for DNA quantification and quality, we sampled mantle, adductor, and gill tissues from 30 individuals and placed them into 2 mL O-ring vials with 95% molecular-grade ethanol. We stored the samples temporarily in a -20℃ freezer before transferring them to a -80℃ freezer.
Accessing the oyster tissue within the shell: Two methods were used to enter the oyster shell: creating a notch in the shell or relaxing the oyster. Creating a notch allowed for the extraction of fluid that contains genetic material (e.g., hemolymph or EPF), while relaxing the oyster allowed for tissue swabbing or direct sampling of the tissue.
Collection of genetic material
Cell collection for notched oysters: Cells were collected from notched oysters by sampling hemolymph or EPF fluids. For the preservation of fluids, we split the samples and placed half in liquid nitrogen and the other half in FTA cards (see below):
Cell collection for relaxed oysters: Cells were collected from relaxed oysters by taking a mantle biopsy or swabbing the mantle tissue.
Preservation of genetic material: We used three preservation protocols for the genetic samples: ethanol, flash-freezing, and FTA cards:
DNA extraction: A Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen; 69504) was used for all DNA extractions, but with slight modifications for different cell types or preservation methods. The manufacturer’s instructions were used for the control and the mantle biopsy groups with 20- 30mg of tissue, as well as the swabs (swabs were horizontally cut in half before extraction so that they could be submerged fully in the buffer). We modified the protocol for the EPF and Hemolymph samples by using 200 µL of the flash-frozen sample as input (based on preliminary trials of 20, 100, and 200 µL that showed the latter amount yielded the most DNA) but otherwise followed the manufacturer’s instructions. For the Whatman FTA Cards, we used a 6.0mm biopsy punch (Cenmed™ PMD Sterile, Disposable Biopsy Punches) to cut a disk from the middle of the card. Per recommendation from Sigma Aldrich, 280 microliters of the ATL buffer was added to the disk for extraction, and the remainder of the manufacturer’s instructions were followed (Reliable DNA Extraction from WhatmanTM FTA Cards, n.d.).
DNA quantification and quality assessment: We used a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer to quantify DNA yield from the extractions. We used the High Sensitivity Kit (ThermoFisher; Q32851) for samples with a yield between 0 and 20 ng/ul and the Broad Range Kit (ThermoFisher; Q32850) for all samples with a yield higher than 20 ng/ul.
To test the quality of the DNA, we ran 3 μL of each DNA extract on a 1% agarose gel (0.6g of agarose with 60 mL of 1x TAE buffer), stained with GelRed at 130V for 30 minutes. Gels were visualized, and images were captured on a BioRad Gel Doc XR+ Molecular Imager machine. We categorized each sample on the gel into one of four levels: a bright band greater than 3000 bp with a slight smear (level 1), a completely smeared sample (level 2), a barely visible gel (level 3), or no band (level 4).
Oyster mortality data from oysters in the same experiment.
Leung, E., Small, J., Lotterhos, K. (2026). DNA metrics from minimally-lethal genotyping with eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) conducted in 2022 and 2023. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2026-08-17 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/1005320 [access date]
Terms of Use
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
If you wish to use this dataset, it is highly recommended that you contact the original principal investigators (PI). Should the relevant PI be unavailable, please contact BCO-DMO (info@bco-dmo.org) for additional guidance. For general guidance please see the BCO-DMO Terms of Use document.